Disney Got Cold Feet on Deepfaking The Rock

Disney spent 18 months negotiating with AI company Metaphysic to deepfake Dwayne Johnson's face onto his cousin Tanoai Reed for the live-action Moana film. Johnson had agreed. The technology was ready. The cost savings would have been substantial—The Rock commands serious money, and his schedule is famously packed. Then Disney got cold feet and killed the project over "data security concerns" and "legal uncertainties."

This cautious retreat might feel responsible, but it's also futile. Disney just delayed the inevitable while their competitors figure it out first.

The Math Makes This Unavoidable

Let's talk numbers, because that's what studios understand. The AI in film market is projected to reach $14.1 billion by 2033, growing at 25.7% annually. The deepfake AI market specifically is exploding at 41.5% CAGR, from $562.8 million in 2023 to over $6 billion by 2030. These aren't speculative growth projections—they're economic gravitational forces.

Meanwhile, film production costs continue climbing. California just increased its incentive cap to $750 million annually to compete with other jurisdictions offering better tax breaks. Studios are hemorrhaging money on location shoots, scheduling conflicts, and the astronomical salaries of A-list talent. AI-driven post-production processes have already reduced editing time by up to 40%, and deepfake technology is the logical next step.

The Rock's cousin has been his stunt double across Fast & Furious, Skyscraper, Jumanji, and Jungle Cruise. The physical similarity is already there. The technology can handle the rest. Disney would have saved millions on a single actor for a handful of shots while Johnson worked on other projects. Instead, they chose legal anxiety over economic logic.

Everyone Else Is Moving Forward

While Disney wrestles with ethical concerns, the rest of the industry is quietly adopting these tools. Major VFX studios like Industrial Light & Magic and Animal Logic are actively developing AI face-swapping technology. Digital Domain has been working on machine learning-driven deepfake capabilities for years. Hollywood has been doing digital face replacement for two decades—they're just getting better at it.

Toei Animation integrated AI into multiple stages of production in 2025, from drawing assistance to motion generation. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences ruled that films using AI are eligible for Oscar nominations. Google launched automated dubbing tools using AI-powered voice generation. The infrastructure is being built whether Disney participates or not.

The Indian film industry is already using deepfake technology extensively. The Tamil film "The Greatest of All Time" used AI to create a teenage version of actor Vijay. International productions are embracing what Disney considers too risky. This isn't about being first-to-market anymore—it's about avoiding being last.

The Technology Is Already Here

Here's what Disney's legal team apparently missed: the genie is out of the bottle. DeepFaceLab, available as open-source code on GitHub, already powers 95% of deepfake videos. The technology that once required specialized teams and months of work can now be accomplished by individuals with basic technical skills in 45 minutes.

Voice cloning requires just three seconds of audio to achieve an 85% match. Good-quality deepfake videos cost between $300 to $20,000 per minute to purchase commercially. The price point is dropping while quality improves exponentially. By 2025, experts predict 8 million deepfakes will be shared online—double the current rate every six months.

Disney could have controlled this technology for legitimate creative purposes while establishing industry standards. Instead, they're waiting for someone else to solve the "legal uncertainties" they're worried about. That's not leadership—that's following.

The Real Risk Is Falling Behind

Disney's concern about "data security and legal uncertainties" sounds prudent until you consider the alternative. Every day they delay, competitors gain advantages in cost efficiency, scheduling flexibility, and creative possibilities. The technology will be used—by someone, somewhere, for something. The question is whether Disney wants to shape how it's used or respond to how others use it.

The company that created Mickey Mouse through technical innovation, that pioneered feature-length animation, that revolutionized theme park experiences, is now afraid of a technology that could solve real production problems. This isn't about replacing actors—it's about giving directors more tools and studios more options.

Consider the practical benefits Disney walked away from: Johnson could work on multiple projects simultaneously, reducing scheduling conflicts. Reshoots could happen without coordinating A-list schedules. Dangerous stunt work could be handled by specialists while maintaining star likenesses. International versions could feature localized talent with global star faces. These aren't dystopian scenarios—they're production efficiencies.

The Ethical Red Herring

Much of the resistance to deepfake technology in Hollywood stems from legitimate concerns about consent, authenticity, and the potential for misuse. But the Disney-Johnson case involved full consent from the actor, limited application to specific shots, and legitimate creative purposes. This wasn't about creating unauthorized content—it was about solving practical production challenges.

The same unions that fought AI adoption in the 2023 strikes understand the difference between technology that replaces workers and technology that augments production. Johnson wasn't being replaced—he was being duplicated for specific circumstances. His cousin would still perform the physical work, and Johnson would still get paid. The technology would simply allow for more flexible scheduling.

Meanwhile, malicious actors are already using deepfake technology for fraud, harassment, and misinformation. In 2024, businesses faced average losses of nearly $500,000 from deepfake-related fraud. The Arup Group lost $25 million to a deepfake scam. North America saw a 1,740% increase in deepfake fraud. The technology is being weaponized while legitimate uses get delayed by corporate anxiety.

The Inevitable Future

Disney will eventually use this technology. Not because they want to, but because the economic pressure will become irresistible. When competitors can deliver similar quality at lower costs with more flexibility, market forces will decide. The question is whether Disney leads this transition or gets forced into it.

The company's backup plan involved creating a generative AI character named "Bit" for Tron: Ares, which they also canceled due to "legal risks and fears of public backlash." This pattern of technological timidity doesn't match Disney's innovative legacy. The same company that bet on computer animation for Pixar is now afraid of the next logical step.

Every major technological shift in entertainment faces initial resistance. Sound films, color films, computer animation, digital distribution—all were once considered risky departures from established practices. The companies that thrived were those that recognized the inevitable and positioned themselves accordingly.

The deepfake market will reach $6 billion by 2030 whether Disney participates or not. Other studios will solve the legal and technical challenges Disney considers insurmountable. Audiences will accept AI-assisted content because they won't be able to tell the difference. The technology will become standard practice while Disney explains why they chose caution over leadership.

What Disney Should Do Next

Instead of avoiding deepfake technology, Disney should be establishing the standards for its ethical use. Partner with actors' unions to create consent frameworks. Develop technical standards for quality and disclosure. Create legal precedents for intellectual property protection. Be the company that shows how this technology can be used responsibly rather than the one that pretends it doesn't exist.

The Rock was willing to be the test case. His cousin was ready to be the physical performer. The technology was proven. The only thing missing was corporate courage to embrace an inevitable future. Disney's retreat doesn't stop the technology—it just ensures someone else will define how it's used.

The mouse house built its empire on technological innovation and creative risk-taking. Backing out of the deepfake experiment feels like the opposite of both. Sometimes the biggest risk is not taking any risk at all.

Ready to embrace AI innovation while managing the risks? Our growth experts help brands navigate emerging technologies with strategic confidence. Let's build the future.