$100 Million Meta Bonus Was a Myth
Here's a delicious irony: Sam Altman, CEO of the company behind ChatGPT—a tool that's supposed to help us navigate information—just got called out...
3 min read
Writing Team
:
Aug 27, 2025 8:00:00 AM
Stanford just confirmed what we all suspected but nobody wanted to admit: we're systematically eliminating the very people who should be our industry's future.
New research from economist Erik Brynjolfsson reveals that employment for workers aged 22-25 in AI-impacted roles—including the customer support and content creation jobs that traditionally serve as marketing career entry points—has dropped 16% since late 2022. That's not a statistical blip. That's a generational catastrophe disguised as efficiency gains.
Brynjolfsson calls this "the fastest, broadest change" he's witnessed, comparable only to the pandemic's remote work shift. But here's the difference: remote work created new opportunities while maintaining human roles. AI deployment, as currently executed, is simply erasing them.
The pattern is particularly brutal in marketing-adjacent functions. Entry-level content creation, customer service, and campaign coordination roles—the traditional proving grounds for future marketing leaders—are being automated away faster than companies can say "productivity gains."
Here's the cruel irony: AI excels at tasks requiring "book knowledge" but struggles with the tacit expertise that makes senior marketers valuable. As Brynjolfsson notes, "More senior workers have more tacit knowledge, they learn tricks of the trade that maybe never get written down." But how exactly do we expect people to develop that tacit knowledge if we've eliminated their opportunity to start learning it?
We're creating a dystopian catch-22: AI handles entry-level work because it lacks nuance, but humans can't develop that nuance without entry-level experience. It's like removing all the minor league teams and wondering why there are no major league players.
While tech executives celebrate their AI productivity gains, they're ignoring a looming crisis: where exactly will the next generation of marketing leaders come from? The junior copywriters who become creative directors, the campaign coordinators who become growth strategists, the customer service reps who understand consumer psychology better than any persona document—they're all being replaced by systems that can mimic their output but not develop their judgment.
Marketing has always been an apprenticeship industry. You learn by doing, failing, adapting, and building intuitive understanding of human behavior. AI can simulate the doing part, but it can't replicate the learning journey that creates marketing leaders capable of strategic thinking.
Companies deploying AI as a replacement strategy rather than augmentation are making a classic short-term optimization error. Yes, AI can handle routine customer inquiries and generate basic content. But it can't develop the brand intuition, cultural awareness, and strategic thinking that drive long-term growth.
Brynjolfsson's research shows that companies using AI to augment human workers are actually hiring more, while replacement-focused organizations are hiring less. The difference isn't just philosophical—it's reflected in business outcomes and talent development.
The most sobering aspect of this research isn't just current job displacement—it's the pipeline problem it creates. If we eliminate entry-level marketing roles today, where do we find experienced marketing professionals in five years? AI might be able to write subject lines and segment audiences, but it can't develop the strategic vision and cultural intelligence that successful marketing requires.
We're essentially burning the seed corn of our industry while celebrating the efficiency of the fire.
Brynjolfsson poses the critical question: will AI continue targeting entry-level roles, or will higher-skilled workers eventually face the same displacement? For marketing leaders, this isn't academic speculation—it's workforce planning reality.
The evidence suggests we're seeing "just the canary in the coal mine." As AI capabilities improve, the automation pressure will move up the experience ladder. But without a healthy pipeline of developing talent, the marketing industry will find itself with a generation gap that no amount of AI sophistication can fill.
The solution isn't to halt AI adoption—it's to deploy it intelligently. Use AI to handle routine tasks while creating new entry-level roles focused on AI collaboration, quality control, and strategic oversight. Train junior staff to work alongside AI systems rather than compete with them.
Smart marketing organizations are already creating hybrid roles: AI prompt engineers, content quality specialists, and automation strategists. These positions require both technical fluency and marketing judgment—exactly the kind of roles that can develop the next generation of marketing leaders.
Because the companies that figure out how to develop human talent alongside AI capabilities won't just survive the automation wave—they'll dominate it.
Ready to build an AI strategy that enhances rather than eliminates your marketing talent? Winsome Marketing's growth experts help companies deploy AI while developing the human capabilities that drive long-term success.
Here's a delicious irony: Sam Altman, CEO of the company behind ChatGPT—a tool that's supposed to help us navigate information—just got called out...
The AI job apocalypse was supposed to be biblical by now. Mass unemployment, entire industries decimated, humans shuffling through breadlines while...
Clutches pearls Young people are using AI to do their jobs faster and better, and sometimes they're not broadcasting every single prompt they fed to...