Watch what happens when new technology arrives in a traditional professional service industry.
Everyone stands at the edge of the cliff, looking down. Nobody jumps. They're all waiting for someone else to go first, make sure the landing doesn't kill them, and report back on whether it was worth the trip.
This is the lemming effect, and it dominates conservative industries.
The irony is that the first person who jumps doesn't hit the ground. They build a bridge while everyone else is still deliberating. By the time the crowd works up the courage to move, the early mover has already established the toll booth.
Professional services are risk-averse for legitimate reasons.
When you're handling someone's taxes, legal affairs, or financial operations, experimentation carries real consequences. Clients hire you specifically because you're steady, reliable, and won't surprise them.
This creates institutional conservatism. Firms develop cultures where the safest career move is to never be the first to try anything. Wait for others to validate the approach. Let someone else take the arrows.
Partners who've spent decades building reputations aren't eager to risk those reputations on unproven strategies. Better to wait, watch, and follow once the path is clear.
This logic makes sense for individual career preservation. It's terrible for competitive positioning.
Here's the problem with waiting for validation: by the time something is validated, it's no longer differentiated.
When five firms can credibly claim the same capability, you're back to competing on price and relationships. The strategic advantage has evaporated.
Early movers get something invaluable: time to build expertise, refine processes, and establish market perception before competition arrives.
When competitors eventually catch up on capabilities, the early mover has already captured mindshare. They're "the firm that does X" even after others can do X equally well.
This perception advantage compounds over time.
Bold positioning only works when it's backed by genuine capability.
This is why most firms can't simply decide to position boldly tomorrow. They haven't built the underlying substance to support the positioning.
But here's the interesting part: building that substance takes time. The longer you wait to start, the longer until you can credibly position boldly.
Firms that start building capabilities now—even before they're ready to talk about them publicly—create the foundation for bold positioning later.
The key is sequencing correctly. Build first, position second. Never the reverse.
One common objection to bold positioning is "the market isn't ready yet."
This is almost always wrong.
Markets contain multiples segments with different levels of readiness. While the conservative majority might not be ready, the early adopter segment absolutely is. They're actively looking for firms that understand emerging trends.
By positioning boldly, you're not trying to convert the entire market. You're signaling to the segment that's already ready to move.
This is actually safer than it appears. The conservative clients who want traditional services will continue working with traditional firms. You're not losing them—you never had a chance with them anyway.
Meanwhile, you're capturing the entire early adopter segment that your conservative competitors are ignoring.
Bold positioning requires proof points.
You can't just announce you're innovative and expect the market to believe you. You need demonstrable evidence.
This is where the R&D infrastructure, the partnerships, the internal implementations all matter. They're not just operational improvements—they're proof points that support bold positioning.
When you position boldly and someone asks "prove it," you need multiple answers ready. The more layers of proof you have, the more credible your bold positioning becomes.
Firms that position boldly without proof points get dismissed as marketing hype. Firms that position boldly with deep proof stacks get recognized as legitimate leaders.
Bold positioning creates an interesting secondary benefit: it attracts different talent.
The best people in any industry want to work on interesting problems at the cutting edge. They don't want to spend careers maintaining the status quo.
When your positioning clearly signals "we're doing something different here," you attract people who are excited by that difference.
This creates a talent flywheel. Better talent delivers better results, which reinforces your bold positioning, which attracts even better talent.
Conservative positioning attracts conservative talent, which reinforces conservative positioning. That's a flywheel too, but it's spinning in the wrong direction.
Here's something most firms miss about bold positioning: it creates natural expansion paths with existing clients.
Many clients initially hire professional service firms for traditional work. They're not ready for cutting-edge solutions on day one.
But once you're working together and they see the quality of your thinking, they become curious about your innovative capabilities.
Bold positioning gives you something to expand into. "We're currently handling your traditional needs, but when you're ready to explore what's next, we've been building capabilities in that direction."
Conservative positioning offers no expansion path. You're already delivering exactly what you positioned for. Where do you grow from there?
Is bold positioning risky? Sure. Any departure from consensus carries risk.
But understand what you're comparing it against.
The "safe" choice—waiting, following, positioning conservatively—carries its own risk. The risk of commoditization. The risk of competing purely on price. The risk of becoming irrelevant as the market evolves.
These risks are less visible because they accumulate gradually. But they're just as dangerous as the risks associated with bold moves.
The question isn't whether to take risks. The question is which risks are worth taking.
If you're going to position boldly, start building the substance today.
Don't wait until you're "ready" to go public. Start the internal work, the partnerships, the capability development now.
Bold positioning isn't a light switch you flip. It's a journey that begins long before you make any public statements.
The firms winning through bold positioning five years from now started building three years ago. They're announcing now what they've been building in private.
Ready to break from the pack and establish distinctive market positioning? We'll help you build the substance and tell the story that sets you apart.
Writing Team : Dec 1, 2025 8:00:01 AM
You've spent twenty years asking the same fundamental question about your industry. The question persists not because you haven't found answers, but...
Writing Team : Dec 8, 2025 7:59:59 AM
You've built something new. Something genuinely innovative that positions your firm for the next decade.
Accounting Marketing Writing Team : Oct 25, 2024 6:05:04 PM
The accounting industry is rapidly evolving, and with it, so are client expectations. Today, clients expect quick, accurate responses to their...
Writing Team